← Back to context Comment by ErroneousBosh 10 days ago [citation needed] 8 comments ErroneousBosh Reply lostlogin 10 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 10 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? lostlogin 10 days ago Radiation doesn’t label the cancers it causes.Other than comparing population groups, what method do we have? 5 replies →
lostlogin 10 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 10 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? lostlogin 10 days ago Radiation doesn’t label the cancers it causes.Other than comparing population groups, what method do we have? 5 replies →
ErroneousBosh 10 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? lostlogin 10 days ago Radiation doesn’t label the cancers it causes.Other than comparing population groups, what method do we have? 5 replies →
lostlogin 10 days ago Radiation doesn’t label the cancers it causes.Other than comparing population groups, what method do we have? 5 replies →
5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.
https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat...
I think they're reading too much into it.
How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"?
Radiation doesn’t label the cancers it causes.
Other than comparing population groups, what method do we have?
5 replies →