← Back to context Comment by alberto467 8 days ago It is the UK we're talking about after all... 5 comments alberto467 Reply niels8472 8 days ago Where the accused have rights too? alberto467 8 days ago Where the journalists have very little rights, and people posting their bad (wrong) ideas (think) even less so. niels8472 8 days ago Not according to the wpfi world press freedom index where it is ranked 20th. mrkstu 8 days ago Where speaking truth isn’t a right or a defense pelorat 8 days ago Most media in Europe are required to ambiguate names of criminals. For instance by removing the first name or the last name.
niels8472 8 days ago Where the accused have rights too? alberto467 8 days ago Where the journalists have very little rights, and people posting their bad (wrong) ideas (think) even less so. niels8472 8 days ago Not according to the wpfi world press freedom index where it is ranked 20th. mrkstu 8 days ago Where speaking truth isn’t a right or a defense
alberto467 8 days ago Where the journalists have very little rights, and people posting their bad (wrong) ideas (think) even less so. niels8472 8 days ago Not according to the wpfi world press freedom index where it is ranked 20th.
pelorat 8 days ago Most media in Europe are required to ambiguate names of criminals. For instance by removing the first name or the last name.
Where the accused have rights too?
Where the journalists have very little rights, and people posting their bad (wrong) ideas (think) even less so.
Not according to the wpfi world press freedom index where it is ranked 20th.
Where speaking truth isn’t a right or a defense
Most media in Europe are required to ambiguate names of criminals. For instance by removing the first name or the last name.