IME, in prose writing, arguing with LLM can help a newer writer to gather 'the facts' (to help with research) and 'the objections to the facts' (same result) to anticipate an initial approach to the material. This can save a lot of organizational time. After which, newer writer can more confidently approach topics in their own voice.
The question is… why? What is the actual human benefit (not monetary).
IME, in prose writing, arguing with LLM can help a newer writer to gather 'the facts' (to help with research) and 'the objections to the facts' (same result) to anticipate an initial approach to the material. This can save a lot of organizational time. After which, newer writer can more confidently approach topics in their own voice.
If AI wrote and thought better by default then I wouldn't have to read the AI slop my co-workers send me.
Just let my work have a soul, please.
That is NOT possible.
Why not?
13 replies →
Eh, it's not __that__ simple.
It is, just don’t use a thing with no soul like ai if soul is what you’re after.
2 replies →
[flagged]