← Back to context Comment by awesome_dude 10 days ago I'm not sure if that's a criticism or praise - I mean, most people strive for readable code. 3 comments awesome_dude Reply candiddevmike 10 days ago LLM generated code reminds me of perl's "write-only" reputation. coldtea 10 days ago Does it really? Because I see some quite fine code. The problem is assumptions, or missing side effects when the code is used, or getting stuck in a bad approach "loop" - but not code quality per se. awesome_dude 10 days ago In all honesty I've only used LLMs in anger with Go, and come away (generally speaking) happy with what it produced.
candiddevmike 10 days ago LLM generated code reminds me of perl's "write-only" reputation. coldtea 10 days ago Does it really? Because I see some quite fine code. The problem is assumptions, or missing side effects when the code is used, or getting stuck in a bad approach "loop" - but not code quality per se. awesome_dude 10 days ago In all honesty I've only used LLMs in anger with Go, and come away (generally speaking) happy with what it produced.
coldtea 10 days ago Does it really? Because I see some quite fine code. The problem is assumptions, or missing side effects when the code is used, or getting stuck in a bad approach "loop" - but not code quality per se.
awesome_dude 10 days ago In all honesty I've only used LLMs in anger with Go, and come away (generally speaking) happy with what it produced.
LLM generated code reminds me of perl's "write-only" reputation.
Does it really? Because I see some quite fine code. The problem is assumptions, or missing side effects when the code is used, or getting stuck in a bad approach "loop" - but not code quality per se.
In all honesty I've only used LLMs in anger with Go, and come away (generally speaking) happy with what it produced.