I didn’t say they were. They do have a bias. I have the same one.
My comment was aimed at the implication that the data might be untrustworthy because they were the ones reporting it.
So I pointed out it wasn’t their data.
As for “spin“ Elon has been telling us for a long time that FSD is safer than humans and will save lives. We appear to have objective data that counters that narrative.
Who said the data was untrustworthy, the source of the article is presenting the data in a highly negative light, which it does in 99% of its articles, so it's a worthless website for reporting data of this sort.
It's basically a few light bumps going at snails pace and probably caused by other cars. The articles headline reads as if it mowed down a group of school children.
Electrec is not neutral commenting, it always giving any data an anti-Tesla spin.
I didn’t say they were. They do have a bias. I have the same one.
My comment was aimed at the implication that the data might be untrustworthy because they were the ones reporting it.
So I pointed out it wasn’t their data.
As for “spin“ Elon has been telling us for a long time that FSD is safer than humans and will save lives. We appear to have objective data that counters that narrative.
That seems worth reporting on to me.
Who said the data was untrustworthy, the source of the article is presenting the data in a highly negative light, which it does in 99% of its articles, so it's a worthless website for reporting data of this sort.
It's basically a few light bumps going at snails pace and probably caused by other cars. The articles headline reads as if it mowed down a group of school children.