Comment by vidarh
4 days ago
> My point is that you misread the comment you replied to.
I'm not the person you replied to.
> (By the way, on page 2 of the paper: "we evaluate each LLM only within its corresponding harness.")
That has zero relevance to my comment or to the type of harnesses I talked about in the comment you replied to, nor in my comment up-thread.
The only people I have replied to in this thread were vidarh, vidarh, and now vidarh again. I thought you were all the same person?