← Back to context Comment by fdefitte 3 months ago [dead] 2 comments fdefitte Reply james2doyle 3 months ago That is just not true. These AI scrapers are hammering all types of sites and causing their bills to explode.https://www.pcmag.com/news/wikipedia-faces-flood-of-ai-bots-...The nature of archives is that they are constantly updated. ImPleadThe5th 3 months ago That's a good point I suppose.I guess I'm just kind of sad. LLMS appropriately sourcing material could have been such a boom for artists in a way. I guess I feel like it was a missed opportunity for some mutual benefit.Would have been a really interesting at least.
james2doyle 3 months ago That is just not true. These AI scrapers are hammering all types of sites and causing their bills to explode.https://www.pcmag.com/news/wikipedia-faces-flood-of-ai-bots-...The nature of archives is that they are constantly updated.
ImPleadThe5th 3 months ago That's a good point I suppose.I guess I'm just kind of sad. LLMS appropriately sourcing material could have been such a boom for artists in a way. I guess I feel like it was a missed opportunity for some mutual benefit.Would have been a really interesting at least.
That is just not true. These AI scrapers are hammering all types of sites and causing their bills to explode.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/wikipedia-faces-flood-of-ai-bots-...
The nature of archives is that they are constantly updated.
That's a good point I suppose.
I guess I'm just kind of sad. LLMS appropriately sourcing material could have been such a boom for artists in a way. I guess I feel like it was a missed opportunity for some mutual benefit.
Would have been a really interesting at least.