← Back to context

Comment by buzzerbetrayed

6 days ago

Getting the entire universe to agree on a single clock for creating timestamps sounds absurdly difficult. Probably impossible?

"Agreement" of time is probably nonsense, yeah. I realized after posting so I edited in the parenthetical, but as [3] notes, locality probably makes this less of a real issue.

Apparently with the birthday paradox 32 bit random IDs only allow some tens of thousands per second before collision chance passes 50%. Maybe that's acceptable?

[3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47065241

You don't need the universe to agree. You need your ID system to agree within a reasonable margin of error.

Neutron star spins collectively can be used as a pretty accurate clock.

  • How? You are here on earth, looking at a neutron star. It pulses about N times a minute. I am 5ly away, looking at the same neutron star. Yes, i see the pulses happening at about N times per second, but the pulse delay you see at time T(a) is not the same pulse delay i see at time T(a), it would be another 5 years before i see the same pulse you saw.