← Back to context Comment by mvdtnz 6 days ago You're re-stating his exact problem while trying to refute him. 4 comments mvdtnz Reply fingerlocks 5 days ago No, I’m not. OP is conflating multiple guidelines for different purposes and attempting to use them all simultaneously. zephen 5 days ago > OP is ... attempting to use [multiple guidelines] simultaneously.No, he's literally explaining why the guidelines can't be used simultaneously. fingerlocks 4 days ago They aren't supposed to be used simultaneously, which is literally what my comment was explaining. Different guidelines to solve different problems. 1 reply →
fingerlocks 5 days ago No, I’m not. OP is conflating multiple guidelines for different purposes and attempting to use them all simultaneously. zephen 5 days ago > OP is ... attempting to use [multiple guidelines] simultaneously.No, he's literally explaining why the guidelines can't be used simultaneously. fingerlocks 4 days ago They aren't supposed to be used simultaneously, which is literally what my comment was explaining. Different guidelines to solve different problems. 1 reply →
zephen 5 days ago > OP is ... attempting to use [multiple guidelines] simultaneously.No, he's literally explaining why the guidelines can't be used simultaneously. fingerlocks 4 days ago They aren't supposed to be used simultaneously, which is literally what my comment was explaining. Different guidelines to solve different problems. 1 reply →
fingerlocks 4 days ago They aren't supposed to be used simultaneously, which is literally what my comment was explaining. Different guidelines to solve different problems. 1 reply →
No, I’m not. OP is conflating multiple guidelines for different purposes and attempting to use them all simultaneously.
> OP is ... attempting to use [multiple guidelines] simultaneously.
No, he's literally explaining why the guidelines can't be used simultaneously.
They aren't supposed to be used simultaneously, which is literally what my comment was explaining. Different guidelines to solve different problems.
1 reply →