← Back to context

Comment by newyankee

7 days ago

I mean if it is citing the sources, there is only so much that can be done without altering original meaning.

The sources Gemini cites are usually something completely unrelated to its response. (Not like you're gonna go check anyways.)

An LLM citing sources is linking you to stuff that it recently found that kind-of matches its answers. I don't believe it is possible for an LLM to cite original training materials, and it wouldn't be desirable if those are unavailable to the end-user, anyway.

This is an added nuisance for webmasters beyond automated AI-training scrapers. When users query an LLM like Grok or Gemini, it will go search a list of websites and "browse" them to glean information, and though that seems like a contradiction to what I just wrote, it is not "LLM" activity, not really "agentic", but sort of a smart proxy.

Trust me.