← Back to context Comment by pjc50 4 days ago The counter question is: why have AMD been so bad by comparison? 2 comments pjc50 Reply Eisenstein 4 days ago Because GPUs require a lot on the software side, and AMD sucks at software. They are a CPU company that bought a GPU company. ATI should have been left alone. 0x457 4 days ago Because AMD only every had one strategy for software:Look at it as, we're David against the Goliath, we're going to utilize open-source because that's how you win.Then make zero effecting trying to increase adoption, which then result in reducing support for it and eventually giving up.
Eisenstein 4 days ago Because GPUs require a lot on the software side, and AMD sucks at software. They are a CPU company that bought a GPU company. ATI should have been left alone.
0x457 4 days ago Because AMD only every had one strategy for software:Look at it as, we're David against the Goliath, we're going to utilize open-source because that's how you win.Then make zero effecting trying to increase adoption, which then result in reducing support for it and eventually giving up.
Because GPUs require a lot on the software side, and AMD sucks at software. They are a CPU company that bought a GPU company. ATI should have been left alone.
Because AMD only every had one strategy for software:
Look at it as, we're David against the Goliath, we're going to utilize open-source because that's how you win.
Then make zero effecting trying to increase adoption, which then result in reducing support for it and eventually giving up.