← Back to context Comment by vidarh 1 day ago This feels very Google 4 comments vidarh Reply drbacon 1 day ago I found the Googler! vidarh 1 day ago Nope. The closest I've gotten was rejecting Google recruiters several times.But like everyone else I'm used to Google failing to care about products. cmrdporcupine 1 day ago Inside Google we just constantly joked/complained about "old thing is deprecated, new isn't ready yet"This held for internal APIs, facilities, systems more even than it did for the outside world. Which is terrible. 1 reply →
drbacon 1 day ago I found the Googler! vidarh 1 day ago Nope. The closest I've gotten was rejecting Google recruiters several times.But like everyone else I'm used to Google failing to care about products. cmrdporcupine 1 day ago Inside Google we just constantly joked/complained about "old thing is deprecated, new isn't ready yet"This held for internal APIs, facilities, systems more even than it did for the outside world. Which is terrible. 1 reply →
vidarh 1 day ago Nope. The closest I've gotten was rejecting Google recruiters several times.But like everyone else I'm used to Google failing to care about products. cmrdporcupine 1 day ago Inside Google we just constantly joked/complained about "old thing is deprecated, new isn't ready yet"This held for internal APIs, facilities, systems more even than it did for the outside world. Which is terrible. 1 reply →
cmrdporcupine 1 day ago Inside Google we just constantly joked/complained about "old thing is deprecated, new isn't ready yet"This held for internal APIs, facilities, systems more even than it did for the outside world. Which is terrible. 1 reply →
I found the Googler!
Nope. The closest I've gotten was rejecting Google recruiters several times.
But like everyone else I'm used to Google failing to care about products.
Inside Google we just constantly joked/complained about "old thing is deprecated, new isn't ready yet"
This held for internal APIs, facilities, systems more even than it did for the outside world. Which is terrible.
1 reply →