← Back to context Comment by adamas 2 months ago Isn't Codeberg only for Open Source ? 4 comments adamas Reply ozgrakkurt 2 months ago Github or other commercial alternatives aren’t for closed source either anymore.Putting closed source code on github is basically asking them to launder it through LLMs Epa095 2 months ago But selfhosted Gitea, which OP chose, IS good for closed source. And codeberg is not. ozgrakkurt 2 months ago Alternative of that is self hosted forgejo darthwalsh 2 months ago This is kind of backwards .GitHub's privacy statement [1] says > GitHub personnel does not access private repository information without your consent except as provided...Do you have any evidence that private repos on GitHub are being used for training?In the opposite case, if you have a public repo on GitHub then you should expect it to be laundered through LLMs :\[1] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/gith...
ozgrakkurt 2 months ago Github or other commercial alternatives aren’t for closed source either anymore.Putting closed source code on github is basically asking them to launder it through LLMs Epa095 2 months ago But selfhosted Gitea, which OP chose, IS good for closed source. And codeberg is not. ozgrakkurt 2 months ago Alternative of that is self hosted forgejo darthwalsh 2 months ago This is kind of backwards .GitHub's privacy statement [1] says > GitHub personnel does not access private repository information without your consent except as provided...Do you have any evidence that private repos on GitHub are being used for training?In the opposite case, if you have a public repo on GitHub then you should expect it to be laundered through LLMs :\[1] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/gith...
Epa095 2 months ago But selfhosted Gitea, which OP chose, IS good for closed source. And codeberg is not. ozgrakkurt 2 months ago Alternative of that is self hosted forgejo
darthwalsh 2 months ago This is kind of backwards .GitHub's privacy statement [1] says > GitHub personnel does not access private repository information without your consent except as provided...Do you have any evidence that private repos on GitHub are being used for training?In the opposite case, if you have a public repo on GitHub then you should expect it to be laundered through LLMs :\[1] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/gith...
Github or other commercial alternatives aren’t for closed source either anymore.
Putting closed source code on github is basically asking them to launder it through LLMs
But selfhosted Gitea, which OP chose, IS good for closed source. And codeberg is not.
Alternative of that is self hosted forgejo
This is kind of backwards .
GitHub's privacy statement [1] says > GitHub personnel does not access private repository information without your consent except as provided...
Do you have any evidence that private repos on GitHub are being used for training?
In the opposite case, if you have a public repo on GitHub then you should expect it to be laundered through LLMs :\
[1] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/gith...