← Back to context Comment by gaigalas 1 day ago That's not a citation. 4 comments gaigalas Reply emp17344 1 day ago That’s because there’s no objective research on this. Similarly, there are no good citations to support your objection. They simply don’t exist yet. gaigalas 1 day ago Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then. LoganDark 1 day ago Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section. LoganDark 1 day ago It's roughly why I think this way, along with a statement that I don't have objective citations. So sure, it's not a citation. I even said as much, right in the middle there.
emp17344 1 day ago That’s because there’s no objective research on this. Similarly, there are no good citations to support your objection. They simply don’t exist yet. gaigalas 1 day ago Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then. LoganDark 1 day ago Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.
gaigalas 1 day ago Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then. LoganDark 1 day ago Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.
LoganDark 1 day ago It's roughly why I think this way, along with a statement that I don't have objective citations. So sure, it's not a citation. I even said as much, right in the middle there.
That’s because there’s no objective research on this. Similarly, there are no good citations to support your objection. They simply don’t exist yet.
Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then.
Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.
It's roughly why I think this way, along with a statement that I don't have objective citations. So sure, it's not a citation. I even said as much, right in the middle there.