← Back to context Comment by gaigalas 2 days ago That's not a citation. 4 comments gaigalas Reply LoganDark 2 days ago It's roughly why I think this way, along with a statement that I don't have objective citations. So sure, it's not a citation. I even said as much, right in the middle there. emp17344 2 days ago That’s because there’s no objective research on this. Similarly, there are no good citations to support your objection. They simply don’t exist yet. gaigalas 2 days ago Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then. LoganDark 2 days ago Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.
LoganDark 2 days ago It's roughly why I think this way, along with a statement that I don't have objective citations. So sure, it's not a citation. I even said as much, right in the middle there.
emp17344 2 days ago That’s because there’s no objective research on this. Similarly, there are no good citations to support your objection. They simply don’t exist yet. gaigalas 2 days ago Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then. LoganDark 2 days ago Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.
gaigalas 2 days ago Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then. LoganDark 2 days ago Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.
It's roughly why I think this way, along with a statement that I don't have objective citations. So sure, it's not a citation. I even said as much, right in the middle there.
That’s because there’s no objective research on this. Similarly, there are no good citations to support your objection. They simply don’t exist yet.
Maybe not worth discussing something that cannot be objectively assessed then.
Then don't; all I did was offer my thoughts in a public comments section.