← Back to context Comment by zeroonetwothree 7 days ago NY v Trump was a state criminal case. The Supreme Court would not have been involved. 1 comment zeroonetwothree Reply ceejayoz 7 days ago > NY v Trump was a state criminal case. The Supreme Court would not have been involved.Bullshit.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_ClauseSCOTUS overturns state laws and convictions plenty.State criminal case: https://oklahomavoice.com/2025/02/25/u-s-supreme-court-tosse...State laws held unconstitutional: https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/state-laws-held-uncon...
ceejayoz 7 days ago > NY v Trump was a state criminal case. The Supreme Court would not have been involved.Bullshit.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_ClauseSCOTUS overturns state laws and convictions plenty.State criminal case: https://oklahomavoice.com/2025/02/25/u-s-supreme-court-tosse...State laws held unconstitutional: https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/state-laws-held-uncon...
> NY v Trump was a state criminal case. The Supreme Court would not have been involved.
Bullshit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause
SCOTUS overturns state laws and convictions plenty.
State criminal case: https://oklahomavoice.com/2025/02/25/u-s-supreme-court-tosse...
State laws held unconstitutional: https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/state-laws-held-uncon...