Comment by emp17344
1 day ago
Your entire argument is derived from a pseudoscientific field without any peer-reviewed research. Mechanistic interpretability is a joke invented by AI firms to sell chatbots.
1 day ago
Your entire argument is derived from a pseudoscientific field without any peer-reviewed research. Mechanistic interpretability is a joke invented by AI firms to sell chatbots.
Lol that's a stupid ass response, especially when half the papers are from universities from China. You think the chinese universities are trying to sell ChatGPT subscriptions? Ridiculous. You're just falling behind in tech knowledge.
And apparently you think peer reviewed papers presented at NeurIPS or other conferences are considered pseudoscience. (For the people not versed in ML, NeurIPS is where the 2017 paper "Attention is All You Need" that started the modern ML revolution was presented)
https://neurips.cc/virtual/2023/poster/72666
https://jmlr.org/beta/papers/v26/23-0058.html
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v267/palumbo25a.html
https://iclr.cc/virtual/2026/poster/10011755