← Back to context

Comment by palmotea

6 hours ago

> It's also kind of ironic that a site whose whole premise is to preserve pages forever, whether the people involved like it or not

Oddly, I think archive.today has explicitly said that's not what they're there for, and the people shouldn't rely on their links as a long-term archive.

What are they for then

  • Bypassing paywalls? It actually seems like they've got accounts at many paywalled sites. Shorter term archiving?

    Given the unclear ownership situation, it makes sense not to rely on them for anything long term. They could disappear tomorrow.