Comment by wamiks

Thanks for the link. Yeah, interesting and creative work. I can see how it can help reason about large models. "Interpret" seems more aspirational than real. It's still largely narrative driven. I've been waiting for something deep in this area, I'm not sure it will be this community or not. For sure, as of today, the bold claim is someone understands.

> Your argument applies to humans as well

Yeah, I'm talking about obvious and trivial errors that reveal lack of representation of the code. But your question did make me think, cheers.