Comment by mattmanser
3 days ago
No, I meant subtlety of definition, you've attributed the diligence to the LLM when in fact it's the tests that provide that.
You've unfortunately committed the big sin of anthropomorphizing the LLM and calling it diligent.
An LLM cannot be diligant, it's stochastic so it's literally impossible for it to be diligant.
Writing all those tests was diligant.
I didn’t attribute diligence to anything.
I’m not worried about the personal character of diligence. I’m interested in what the technology unlocked and how things made with it are materially different in terms of labor configurations.
Lmfao I’ve committed the sin of anthropomorphism.
Fadda forgive me!
C’mon pal.