← Back to context Comment by weregiraffe 1 day ago Who decided what is an observable fact? 9 comments weregiraffe Reply tptacek 1 day ago A reliable source (WP:RS). The encyclopedia is about the citations; it's a travel atlas to the sources about a subject. Any conclusions the encyclopedia draws "itself" are secondary to the sources. weregiraffe 18 hours ago Who decides which sources are reliable? input_sh 16 hours ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 3 replies → tptacek 17 hours ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project. gopher_space 1 day ago The philosophy department. Loughla 1 day ago What's your point?
tptacek 1 day ago A reliable source (WP:RS). The encyclopedia is about the citations; it's a travel atlas to the sources about a subject. Any conclusions the encyclopedia draws "itself" are secondary to the sources. weregiraffe 18 hours ago Who decides which sources are reliable? input_sh 16 hours ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 3 replies → tptacek 17 hours ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project.
weregiraffe 18 hours ago Who decides which sources are reliable? input_sh 16 hours ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 3 replies → tptacek 17 hours ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project.
input_sh 16 hours ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 3 replies →
tptacek 17 hours ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project.
A reliable source (WP:RS). The encyclopedia is about the citations; it's a travel atlas to the sources about a subject. Any conclusions the encyclopedia draws "itself" are secondary to the sources.
Who decides which sources are reliable?
Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you?
3 replies →
Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project.
The philosophy department.
What's your point?