← Back to context Comment by weregiraffe 3 days ago Who decided what is an observable fact? 10 comments weregiraffe Reply tptacek 3 days ago A reliable source (WP:RS). The encyclopedia is about the citations; it's a travel atlas to the sources about a subject. Any conclusions the encyclopedia draws "itself" are secondary to the sources. weregiraffe 2 days ago Who decides which sources are reliable? tptacek 2 days ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project. input_sh 2 days ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 4 replies → gopher_space 3 days ago The philosophy department. Loughla 3 days ago What's your point?
tptacek 3 days ago A reliable source (WP:RS). The encyclopedia is about the citations; it's a travel atlas to the sources about a subject. Any conclusions the encyclopedia draws "itself" are secondary to the sources. weregiraffe 2 days ago Who decides which sources are reliable? tptacek 2 days ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project. input_sh 2 days ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 4 replies →
weregiraffe 2 days ago Who decides which sources are reliable? tptacek 2 days ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project. input_sh 2 days ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 4 replies →
tptacek 2 days ago Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project.
input_sh 2 days ago Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you? 4 replies →
A reliable source (WP:RS). The encyclopedia is about the citations; it's a travel atlas to the sources about a subject. Any conclusions the encyclopedia draws "itself" are secondary to the sources.
Who decides which sources are reliable?
Read WP:RS. It's a very complicated answer, and one of the most important policy processes in the project.
Have you tried spending some time researching how Wikipedia works yourself instead of waiting for someone to spoon feed you?
4 replies →
The philosophy department.
What's your point?