← Back to context Comment by NewsaHackO 2 days ago [flagged] 2 comments NewsaHackO Reply oenton 2 days ago That's clearly not a good faith interpretation of the commenter you're referring to. Do better.> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html NewsaHackO 2 days ago lol
oenton 2 days ago That's clearly not a good faith interpretation of the commenter you're referring to. Do better.> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html NewsaHackO 2 days ago lol
That's clearly not a good faith interpretation of the commenter you're referring to. Do better.
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
lol