← Back to context Comment by NewsaHackO 15 hours ago [flagged] 2 comments NewsaHackO Reply oenton 13 hours ago That's clearly not a good faith interpretation of the commenter you're referring to. Do better.> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html NewsaHackO 12 hours ago lol
oenton 13 hours ago That's clearly not a good faith interpretation of the commenter you're referring to. Do better.> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html NewsaHackO 12 hours ago lol
That's clearly not a good faith interpretation of the commenter you're referring to. Do better.
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
lol