← Back to context

Comment by jrflowers

3 days ago

This seems like you should take up your concern about Ray Peat with Wikipedia directly.

For me, it seems obvious that Ray Peat is not particularly notable — even if his self-published manuscripts made him a sort of personal hero to a handful of niche micro influencers on one of the big four social media websites. A quick google shows that he did not “come up with the seed oil craze”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_oil_misinformation

If I had to guess what’s happened here, it looks like maybe some right-wing micro influencers tweeted that Ray Peat was more notable than he really was and those tweets weren’t convincing to Wikipedia editors.

It is good to have notability standards, even if somewhat arbitrary. It protects the site and its editors from being obligated to document and take seriously every silly thing that nano-celebrities and trolls try to will into existence through their tweets.

Especially since there is already a website for exactly that, grokipedia.