← Back to context Comment by nailer 1 month ago [flagged] 5 comments nailer Reply ceejayoz 1 month ago Which fact would you like to dispute?That the Geneva Conventions cover more than civilians is... not tough to back up. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciii-1949 LorenPechtel 1 month ago And what is the relevance here? That's talking about prisoners of war, not talking about military use of "civilian" things. ceejayoz 1 month ago Are POWs civilians?Again, the claim upthread: "All the Geneva protections apply only to truly civilian things..."Accurate, or not? 1 reply → nailer 1 month ago I'm just reminding you that you have no citations in your post. I don't wish to debate you.
ceejayoz 1 month ago Which fact would you like to dispute?That the Geneva Conventions cover more than civilians is... not tough to back up. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciii-1949 LorenPechtel 1 month ago And what is the relevance here? That's talking about prisoners of war, not talking about military use of "civilian" things. ceejayoz 1 month ago Are POWs civilians?Again, the claim upthread: "All the Geneva protections apply only to truly civilian things..."Accurate, or not? 1 reply → nailer 1 month ago I'm just reminding you that you have no citations in your post. I don't wish to debate you.
LorenPechtel 1 month ago And what is the relevance here? That's talking about prisoners of war, not talking about military use of "civilian" things. ceejayoz 1 month ago Are POWs civilians?Again, the claim upthread: "All the Geneva protections apply only to truly civilian things..."Accurate, or not? 1 reply →
ceejayoz 1 month ago Are POWs civilians?Again, the claim upthread: "All the Geneva protections apply only to truly civilian things..."Accurate, or not? 1 reply →
nailer 1 month ago I'm just reminding you that you have no citations in your post. I don't wish to debate you.
Which fact would you like to dispute?
That the Geneva Conventions cover more than civilians is... not tough to back up. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciii-1949
And what is the relevance here? That's talking about prisoners of war, not talking about military use of "civilian" things.
Are POWs civilians?
Again, the claim upthread: "All the Geneva protections apply only to truly civilian things..."
Accurate, or not?
1 reply →
I'm just reminding you that you have no citations in your post. I don't wish to debate you.