← Back to context Comment by iamnothere 4 months ago And here we have it, the endgame of safety fascism. Do you have a loicense for that compiler? 4 comments iamnothere Reply simonask 4 months ago Do you call building codes and bridge engineering standards "safety fascism" as well?The stakes aren't any lower for us. iamnothere 4 months ago Me being allowed to publish hobby software is just as high stakes as a fscking bridge? Get a grip, man. simonask 4 months ago You’re moving the goal posts. You can build all the hobby bridges you want. It would be deeply irresponsible to ask the public to cross them, though. 1 reply →
simonask 4 months ago Do you call building codes and bridge engineering standards "safety fascism" as well?The stakes aren't any lower for us. iamnothere 4 months ago Me being allowed to publish hobby software is just as high stakes as a fscking bridge? Get a grip, man. simonask 4 months ago You’re moving the goal posts. You can build all the hobby bridges you want. It would be deeply irresponsible to ask the public to cross them, though. 1 reply →
iamnothere 4 months ago Me being allowed to publish hobby software is just as high stakes as a fscking bridge? Get a grip, man. simonask 4 months ago You’re moving the goal posts. You can build all the hobby bridges you want. It would be deeply irresponsible to ask the public to cross them, though. 1 reply →
simonask 4 months ago You’re moving the goal posts. You can build all the hobby bridges you want. It would be deeply irresponsible to ask the public to cross them, though. 1 reply →
Do you call building codes and bridge engineering standards "safety fascism" as well?
The stakes aren't any lower for us.
Me being allowed to publish hobby software is just as high stakes as a fscking bridge? Get a grip, man.
You’re moving the goal posts. You can build all the hobby bridges you want. It would be deeply irresponsible to ask the public to cross them, though.
1 reply →