← Back to context Comment by hackerman_fi 1 day ago How is it any more of an opinion to "mark" a website as "unsafe" than say, "contains CSAM"? 3 comments hackerman_fi Reply dspillett 1 day ago “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.“unsafe” is a term that is both broader and more vague, so I would consider it opinion unless backed up by appropriate facts (like “contains CSAM”, “contains malware”, and so forth). kmoser 1 day ago > “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.Except when it isn't. CSAM may be easier to define and identify than pornography, but there still exists material that treads a moral grey area. otterley 1 day ago One is disprovable, the other is not.
dspillett 1 day ago “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.“unsafe” is a term that is both broader and more vague, so I would consider it opinion unless backed up by appropriate facts (like “contains CSAM”, “contains malware”, and so forth). kmoser 1 day ago > “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.Except when it isn't. CSAM may be easier to define and identify than pornography, but there still exists material that treads a moral grey area.
kmoser 1 day ago > “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.Except when it isn't. CSAM may be easier to define and identify than pornography, but there still exists material that treads a moral grey area.
“contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.
“unsafe” is a term that is both broader and more vague, so I would consider it opinion unless backed up by appropriate facts (like “contains CSAM”, “contains malware”, and so forth).
> “contains CSAM” is likely an unarguable fact.
Except when it isn't. CSAM may be easier to define and identify than pornography, but there still exists material that treads a moral grey area.
One is disprovable, the other is not.