Comment by dented42
21 hours ago
To be fair, the examples are extremely easy to overlook. They are also, to put it delicately, not the most helpful.
21 hours ago
To be fair, the examples are extremely easy to overlook. They are also, to put it delicately, not the most helpful.
The examples are fine for an early-stage poc project like this one. `minutes` with evaluation trace and `[Fold]<-` are illustrative, and if you work them out with pen and paper, you can get a good grasp on the main ideas of the language. That you have to search for them on a page that looks like a slightly-formatted README instead of having a nice scrollable with syntax-highlighted snippets at the top is because this IS a slightly-formatted README - and that's also completely fine at this stage. What's important is that there are a few interesting concepts there and that it was published. Even if this one fizzles, as 99.999% of languages do, that doesn't matter if some other language down the line gets inspired by those concepts.
Absolutely agree. But fairness precludes denying the existence of examples.
They are not prominent, but they are in a section with the heading 'Examples'.
apparently fold example is very helpful to some.