← Back to context Comment by ta9000 9 hours ago It’s definitely made browsing the open web a worse experience. There should be global opt in/out. 4 comments ta9000 Reply ben_w 1 hour ago There was, the ad agencies either ignored it, or worse used it as an additional signal.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Track croon 3 hours ago Companies made browsing the web a bad experience, not GDPR.This sentiment is so widespread I'm starting to wonder if it's astroturfed by anti-GDPR lobbying. Frieren 5 hours ago > There should be global opt in/out.They should not be. That there is people willing to give their data to big corporations and foreign countries by extension puts everybody at risk. It is a matter of national security and it should not be allowed, no opt in option. computerthings 3 hours ago [dead]
ben_w 1 hour ago There was, the ad agencies either ignored it, or worse used it as an additional signal.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Track
croon 3 hours ago Companies made browsing the web a bad experience, not GDPR.This sentiment is so widespread I'm starting to wonder if it's astroturfed by anti-GDPR lobbying.
Frieren 5 hours ago > There should be global opt in/out.They should not be. That there is people willing to give their data to big corporations and foreign countries by extension puts everybody at risk. It is a matter of national security and it should not be allowed, no opt in option.
There was, the ad agencies either ignored it, or worse used it as an additional signal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Track
Companies made browsing the web a bad experience, not GDPR.
This sentiment is so widespread I'm starting to wonder if it's astroturfed by anti-GDPR lobbying.
> There should be global opt in/out.
They should not be. That there is people willing to give their data to big corporations and foreign countries by extension puts everybody at risk. It is a matter of national security and it should not be allowed, no opt in option.
[dead]