← Back to context

Comment by strongpigeon

20 hours ago

A tad sensationalist perhaps, but "hot garbage" is a bit much.

Maybe I've just lost all patience for fluff, but I gave up trying to figure out what the attack was from the article pretty quickly where the abstract answered all my questions immediately.

  • They've updated the link to the paper, and the summary there is much clearer (but wouldn't drive clicks, obviously).