← Back to context Comment by ErneX 19 hours ago The attacker needs to be connected to a wireless network if I understood this correctly? 3 comments ErneX Reply ProllyInfamous 18 hours ago For all users reading this on their own home network: DISABLE ALL GUEST NETWORKSIt seems as if approved guest access now == system-wide access (at the hardware level). User compartmentalization no longer works. pluralmonad 15 hours ago Is this still true if the guest network is on its own isolated vlan? ProllyInfamous 14 hours ago Correct; this appears to be a hardware-level problem.
ProllyInfamous 18 hours ago For all users reading this on their own home network: DISABLE ALL GUEST NETWORKSIt seems as if approved guest access now == system-wide access (at the hardware level). User compartmentalization no longer works. pluralmonad 15 hours ago Is this still true if the guest network is on its own isolated vlan? ProllyInfamous 14 hours ago Correct; this appears to be a hardware-level problem.
pluralmonad 15 hours ago Is this still true if the guest network is on its own isolated vlan? ProllyInfamous 14 hours ago Correct; this appears to be a hardware-level problem.
For all users reading this on their own home network: DISABLE ALL GUEST NETWORKS
It seems as if approved guest access now == system-wide access (at the hardware level). User compartmentalization no longer works.
Is this still true if the guest network is on its own isolated vlan?
Correct; this appears to be a hardware-level problem.