← Back to context Comment by overfeed 12 hours ago I directly quoted jack - take it up with him. 3 comments overfeed Reply simianwords 12 hours ago > The company is profitable, and Jack could have kept 4000 people employed with no difference in outcomedid he suggest no difference in outcome in terms of profits? overfeed 12 hours ago You can check for yourself, if you RTFA.Everything I said was based off of jack's post, as I quoted it. If you take issue with the non-specificity ot think he was being less than honest - take it up with jack. simianwords 12 hours ago i don't think you understood what i'm saying nor what he's saying. you don't do a layoff without accepting a change in the outcome.
simianwords 12 hours ago > The company is profitable, and Jack could have kept 4000 people employed with no difference in outcomedid he suggest no difference in outcome in terms of profits? overfeed 12 hours ago You can check for yourself, if you RTFA.Everything I said was based off of jack's post, as I quoted it. If you take issue with the non-specificity ot think he was being less than honest - take it up with jack. simianwords 12 hours ago i don't think you understood what i'm saying nor what he's saying. you don't do a layoff without accepting a change in the outcome.
overfeed 12 hours ago You can check for yourself, if you RTFA.Everything I said was based off of jack's post, as I quoted it. If you take issue with the non-specificity ot think he was being less than honest - take it up with jack. simianwords 12 hours ago i don't think you understood what i'm saying nor what he's saying. you don't do a layoff without accepting a change in the outcome.
simianwords 12 hours ago i don't think you understood what i'm saying nor what he's saying. you don't do a layoff without accepting a change in the outcome.
> The company is profitable, and Jack could have kept 4000 people employed with no difference in outcome
did he suggest no difference in outcome in terms of profits?
You can check for yourself, if you RTFA.
Everything I said was based off of jack's post, as I quoted it. If you take issue with the non-specificity ot think he was being less than honest - take it up with jack.
i don't think you understood what i'm saying nor what he's saying. you don't do a layoff without accepting a change in the outcome.