Comment by johnfn
12 hours ago
Do you really think that Opus 4.6 hallucinates to exactly the same degree as GPT-3.5? I am mystified how you can hold this perspective.
12 hours ago
Do you really think that Opus 4.6 hallucinates to exactly the same degree as GPT-3.5? I am mystified how you can hold this perspective.
If you're not seeing the hallucinations, I'd assert you're either not using it enough, or (more likely) you don't have enough knowledge in the subject matter to notice when it's hallucinating.
What a condescending post. You either haven't used any recent models if you make that statement. Anyone who used GPT3.5 and any other newer model know that hallucinations have gone down tremendously.
Of course it's not perfect, here and there are inaccuracies or plain hallucinations, but it's impossible to state that it's still the same garbage it was 3 years ago.
I'm not interested in getting into some argument about who has "more knowledge in the subject matter". I'm genuinely curious: do you think Opus 4.6 hallucinates just as much as GPT-3.5?
Yes. I see it hallucinate method names for 3rd party libraries constantly.
It’s useful, but when users here say they’re vibe coding 98% of their work, I have to think they’re not working on anything complex.
2 replies →
LMFAO does it hallucinate to the same degree as GPT 3?
Which is what was questioned.