← Back to context

Comment by no-dr-onboard

8 hours ago

The government has a responsibility to protect its constituents. Sometimes that requires collaboration. This isn’t hard.

Is this one of those times? Seems pretty clear it's not.

The third amendment is there for a reason. I am a third amendment absolutist and willing to put my life on the line to defend it.

I wonder what you can't justify this way.

  • That’s a good question. Assuming a righteous and just government:

    The government couldn’t justify the killing of innocent civilians.

    The government couldn’t justify the killing of the unborn.

    The government couldn’t justify eugenics.

    There are objective moral absolutes.