Comment by sixQuarks
2 days ago
You forgot to mention they solved vision based autonomous driving, but I guess that doesn’t matter if Elon = bad
2 days ago
You forgot to mention they solved vision based autonomous driving, but I guess that doesn’t matter if Elon = bad
SAE level 2 driver assistance is explicitly not autonomous driving.
It's this kind of dynamic that makes me pull back on my otherwise pretty AI-forward stance. There's an entire community of people who passionately believe it's obvious and undeniable that Elon Musk has solved problems that he has not solved and his companies deliver things they don't deliver. Tesla is absolutely unambiguous in their marketing material (https://www.tesla.com/fsd) that they do not have autonomous driving, but you're far from the first person I've encountered who's been tricked into believing otherwise.
I don't think that's my relationship with AI, I'm hardly an uncritical booster. But would I know if it was?
You definitely would not know if you were, no one does. I think the healthy position is to assume you are wrong and trying to find evidence of why you are wrong
For instance,I'm very skeptical of AI and, from experience, do not think that the current models are worth the cost, but I'm always in HN trying to find arguments/people that use AI successfully to prove that I'm wrong
I know multiple developers paying thousands of months on AI tooling.
I don't need to convince you it's worth it for you, but it's easy to see that other people have found a way to make it worth it for themselves. I would definitely not spend as much as I personally do if it wasn't worth it to me.
Hope daddy sees this and gives you that lollipop.
Gonna need a citation for that, buck.
Huh? They did not "solve" vision based driving.
Of course, but if Elon=great you can ignore that
Seems not solved:
https://fortune.com/2026/02/26/tesla-robotaxis-4x-8x-worse-t...