← Back to context

Comment by melecas

2 days ago

The TechnoCore using human minds as unwitting processing nodes — to solve a problem humans couldn't even be told about — reads differently every few years. 2026 is a particularly strange time to reread it.

Also, that should have been the backstory of the Matrix, and not the whole “living power source” nonsense.

  • I'm convinced that the studio forced the change to 'human batteries' out of concern over a conflict with Hyperion.

    • Probably the idea is broad enough to get away with borrowing it or putting their own spin on the general idea (I mean, it is expected that stores will influence each other and ideas will spread). I’d rather guess that a studio executive thought the battery idea would be more understandable to people (if that is the case though, I think they were dramatically wrong, the computing idea makes much more sense and I think all of us in the audience would have been fine with it).

      1 reply →

  • I saw a YouTube video where they said this was more-or-less the original backstory but then they changed it. I think it said that the People In Charge thought the 'living power source' would be easier for the audience to understand?

    I don't have the link handy, and don't trust everything I read on the Internet, etc, etc.

    But yeah - this makes so much more sense than breeding, raising, and feeding humans just to harvest their body heat.

  • I like how the other story that has this premise is Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

    • Hitchhiker's Guide had a slightly deeper philosophical implication though, in that the premise is that powerful computers already existed to solve complex problems. Earth was created to pose powerful questions.

  • I'm sure that one Star trek episode had the same premise, together with something from Lem. The connection human/machine brain is rather old and human brains being used for computation is so reused, it is practically public domain.