> The Pentagon has argued that it has “no interest” in using AI to conduct mass surveillance or develop autonomous weapons.
Then what the hell else is Project Stargate for? I still have no idea why nobody talks about this half a trillion dollar elephant in the room that OpenAI sits atop.
Its called “agreeing in principle” - useful for negotiations :)
He'll bank the goodwill and take his time then quietly sign the deal the administration wants.
Can you elaborate what you mean?
This https://fortune.com/2026/02/27/openai-in-talks-with-pentagon...
He means that he agrees just to bait a new, better deal.
> The Pentagon has argued that it has “no interest” in using AI to conduct mass surveillance or develop autonomous weapons.
Then what the hell else is Project Stargate for? I still have no idea why nobody talks about this half a trillion dollar elephant in the room that OpenAI sits atop.
"Warfighters"? We live in such jingoistic times...
Why doesn’t the DOD just build their own model like what Trump did with Truth Social?
Did you drop this /s, king?
Why build when you can just take force?
Related:
OpenAI agrees with Dept. of War to deploy models in their classified network
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47189650
Altman says a lot of things.