← Back to context Comment by puppycodes 1 day ago Seems like an absurd distinction to me... Reminds me of "I was just following orders"... 3 comments puppycodes Reply xvector 1 day ago I mean the distinction doesn't really matterThere are many ways to construct HITL UXes. But typically they'd take the form of the first oneI think you're missing the forest for the trees. All Anthropic is saying is that HITL is required before murder, the UX is irrelevant puppycodes 1 day ago I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome.
xvector 1 day ago I mean the distinction doesn't really matterThere are many ways to construct HITL UXes. But typically they'd take the form of the first oneI think you're missing the forest for the trees. All Anthropic is saying is that HITL is required before murder, the UX is irrelevant puppycodes 1 day ago I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome.
puppycodes 1 day ago I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome.
I mean the distinction doesn't really matter
There are many ways to construct HITL UXes. But typically they'd take the form of the first one
I think you're missing the forest for the trees. All Anthropic is saying is that HITL is required before murder, the UX is irrelevant
I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome.