← Back to context

Comment by matsemann

19 hours ago

It's baffling to me that the DNC decided it was more important to support Israel than win the election and do good things at home.

How can you look at the current support for Trump and conclude you would've won in the US by not supporting Israel?

  • Because polls before and after the election were crystal clear on this point.

    Over 30% of Biden 2020 voters said arming genocide was going to affect their vote.

    That's BIDEN VOTERS.

    80% of Democrats wanted an arms embargo.

    Arming Israel meant giving up millions of votes in swing states, in an election that was lost by extremely slim margins in those states.

    And before you ask, it was also clear from polling that ending support to Israel would have cost nearly zero votes from her base.

    And the reason the Harris campaign didn't know this is because they didn't want to know. Campaign staffers were instructed to mark anyone who raised Gaza as "no response". Attendees of the DNC conventions were literally plugging their ears and shielding their eyes from protests, or even laughing about them.

Harris had all sorts of good things planned at home. It’s baffling to me that some voters thought it was more important to lose the election.

  • Voters don't lose elections, campaigns do. Harris failed, and this kind of "turning around of the blame" thing that Dems try to do is one of the reasons why they don't win elections: they never learn.

    • The reality is that Trump voters were (are?) dumb as rocks and tricked by simple populist messaging. There was nothing harris could've done short of succumbing to populism herself, and cloaking her campaign in dishonesty, fear, and simpleton reasoning.

      Maybe she shouldve done that, but you can see why she didn't.