← Back to context

Comment by danny_codes

13 hours ago

Presumably if you kept your nukes you’d built that capacity

That takes money. Ukraine was very poor in 1993. It's even poorer now.

  • What an awful take devoid of context. Russia literally defaulted in 1998, and 'somehow' kept the nukes.

    And today Ukraine is doing quite amazing, considering 12 years of war. I can only dream what it would be if russians didn't steal a generation. Giving up nukes was a giant mistake.

    Back then, giving up on nukes never was about compromising security. In 1993, I remember being full of hope and opportunity to live in peaceful world with less nukes. It felt like we had our backs by France, UK and USA. That was a move full of betrayed optimism, not desperation - giving up third world arsenal because the future is bright.

    • You also need to maintain vectors, at least functioning ICBMs, which cost quite dearly. And Russia had much more ressources than Ukraine at the time, by the way.

      4 replies →