← Back to context Comment by nine_k 3 hours ago Childlessness is a beautifully self-removing trait. 3 comments nine_k Reply card_zero 2 hours ago Ideas aren't genetic. bigDinosaur 1 hour ago It doesn't have to be genetic to be 'self-removing'.What happened to the Shakers? card_zero 1 hour ago OK, religious ideas are kind of genetic via indoctrination. (Epigenetic? Heh.)Meanwhile ideas can be "self-removing" due to being bad, but then you'd just say "that's a bad idea" not "that's self-removing", so genetic descent was implied.
card_zero 2 hours ago Ideas aren't genetic. bigDinosaur 1 hour ago It doesn't have to be genetic to be 'self-removing'.What happened to the Shakers? card_zero 1 hour ago OK, religious ideas are kind of genetic via indoctrination. (Epigenetic? Heh.)Meanwhile ideas can be "self-removing" due to being bad, but then you'd just say "that's a bad idea" not "that's self-removing", so genetic descent was implied.
bigDinosaur 1 hour ago It doesn't have to be genetic to be 'self-removing'.What happened to the Shakers? card_zero 1 hour ago OK, religious ideas are kind of genetic via indoctrination. (Epigenetic? Heh.)Meanwhile ideas can be "self-removing" due to being bad, but then you'd just say "that's a bad idea" not "that's self-removing", so genetic descent was implied.
card_zero 1 hour ago OK, religious ideas are kind of genetic via indoctrination. (Epigenetic? Heh.)Meanwhile ideas can be "self-removing" due to being bad, but then you'd just say "that's a bad idea" not "that's self-removing", so genetic descent was implied.
Ideas aren't genetic.
It doesn't have to be genetic to be 'self-removing'.
What happened to the Shakers?
OK, religious ideas are kind of genetic via indoctrination. (Epigenetic? Heh.)
Meanwhile ideas can be "self-removing" due to being bad, but then you'd just say "that's a bad idea" not "that's self-removing", so genetic descent was implied.