← Back to context Comment by westmeal 15 hours ago Which is used primarily for offense anyway 7 comments westmeal Reply Braxton1980 14 hours ago I'm pretty sure the amount the money spent on offensive actions is significantly less than the defense westmeal 9 hours ago When was America last invaded by a foreign adversary? JumpCrisscross 8 hours ago This resembles anti-vax logic. We haven’t been invaded because our military maintains a strong deterrence and strategic depth. 2 replies → happymellon 8 hours ago Maybe.I was just saying that the purpose of the Department of Defence is to spend the "defence budget".
Braxton1980 14 hours ago I'm pretty sure the amount the money spent on offensive actions is significantly less than the defense westmeal 9 hours ago When was America last invaded by a foreign adversary? JumpCrisscross 8 hours ago This resembles anti-vax logic. We haven’t been invaded because our military maintains a strong deterrence and strategic depth. 2 replies →
westmeal 9 hours ago When was America last invaded by a foreign adversary? JumpCrisscross 8 hours ago This resembles anti-vax logic. We haven’t been invaded because our military maintains a strong deterrence and strategic depth. 2 replies →
JumpCrisscross 8 hours ago This resembles anti-vax logic. We haven’t been invaded because our military maintains a strong deterrence and strategic depth. 2 replies →
happymellon 8 hours ago Maybe.I was just saying that the purpose of the Department of Defence is to spend the "defence budget".
I'm pretty sure the amount the money spent on offensive actions is significantly less than the defense
When was America last invaded by a foreign adversary?
This resembles anti-vax logic. We haven’t been invaded because our military maintains a strong deterrence and strategic depth.
2 replies →
Maybe.
I was just saying that the purpose of the Department of Defence is to spend the "defence budget".