Comment by aspenmartin
14 hours ago
post mortems / bug hunting -- pinpointing what part of the logic was to blame for a certain problem.
14 hours ago
post mortems / bug hunting -- pinpointing what part of the logic was to blame for a certain problem.
Then look at the code, the session will only confuse. To read an LLM's explanation is to anthropomorphize what will just be a probabilistic incident.
this is what granular commits are for, the kilobytes long log of claude running in circles over bullshit isn't going to help anyone
I think the parent comment is saying “why did the agent produce this big, and why wants it caught”, which is a separate problem from what granular commits solve, of finding the bug in the first place.
There is no "why." It will give reasons but they are bullshit too. Even with the prompt you may not get it to produce the bug more than once.
If you sell a coding agent, it makes sense to capture all that stuff because you have (hopefully) test harnesses where you can statistically tease out what prompt changes caused bugs. Most projects wont have those and anyway you don't control the whole context if you are using one of the popular CLIs.
1 reply →