Comment by newswasboring
7 hours ago
> Junior was said specifically.
Yes, but I think you are taking this phrase more literally than its meant to be read.
7 hours ago
> Junior was said specifically.
Yes, but I think you are taking this phrase more literally than its meant to be read.
I don’t think so. Junior was a key designator in the claim and words have meanings. It would have been easier to leave it out if they didn’t intend for it to contribute meaning.
I think this is turning into a Motte and Bailey argument where the junior dev story is used to push the argument and then it’s backpedaled out when others identify the fallacy.