← Back to context Comment by jpgreenall 8 hours ago Sure. But do we think the topic was chosen at random? 7 comments jpgreenall Reply BeetleB 8 hours ago When primed, people will see things that aren't there. sumeno 6 hours ago and it's someone's job to think of that connection before publishing the release and they failed Imustaskforhelp 7 hours ago but sometimes, people do see things behind the curtain.The timing of talking about this topic does feel pretty strange I'd say as well as the GP comment noted? BeetleB 7 hours ago My point is: You're never going to know if this is a coincidence or not.And even if it was intentional, it's of little consequence. jonas21 6 hours ago No, it wasn't chosen at random -- it had to be a question that any reasonable person would immediately recognize as harmless, but where the old model would inject a bunch of safety caveats and the new model would not. messe 6 hours ago > that any reasonable personIn short supply on that side of the Atlantic these days it seems. jstummbillig 6 hours ago No, and it's also not a conspiracy.
BeetleB 8 hours ago When primed, people will see things that aren't there. sumeno 6 hours ago and it's someone's job to think of that connection before publishing the release and they failed Imustaskforhelp 7 hours ago but sometimes, people do see things behind the curtain.The timing of talking about this topic does feel pretty strange I'd say as well as the GP comment noted? BeetleB 7 hours ago My point is: You're never going to know if this is a coincidence or not.And even if it was intentional, it's of little consequence.
sumeno 6 hours ago and it's someone's job to think of that connection before publishing the release and they failed
Imustaskforhelp 7 hours ago but sometimes, people do see things behind the curtain.The timing of talking about this topic does feel pretty strange I'd say as well as the GP comment noted? BeetleB 7 hours ago My point is: You're never going to know if this is a coincidence or not.And even if it was intentional, it's of little consequence.
BeetleB 7 hours ago My point is: You're never going to know if this is a coincidence or not.And even if it was intentional, it's of little consequence.
jonas21 6 hours ago No, it wasn't chosen at random -- it had to be a question that any reasonable person would immediately recognize as harmless, but where the old model would inject a bunch of safety caveats and the new model would not. messe 6 hours ago > that any reasonable personIn short supply on that side of the Atlantic these days it seems.
messe 6 hours ago > that any reasonable personIn short supply on that side of the Atlantic these days it seems.
When primed, people will see things that aren't there.
and it's someone's job to think of that connection before publishing the release and they failed
but sometimes, people do see things behind the curtain.
The timing of talking about this topic does feel pretty strange I'd say as well as the GP comment noted?
My point is: You're never going to know if this is a coincidence or not.
And even if it was intentional, it's of little consequence.
No, it wasn't chosen at random -- it had to be a question that any reasonable person would immediately recognize as harmless, but where the old model would inject a bunch of safety caveats and the new model would not.
> that any reasonable person
In short supply on that side of the Atlantic these days it seems.
No, and it's also not a conspiracy.