← Back to context

Comment by szmarczak

18 hours ago

I've been having it for 1y 4mo.

> You’re babying it with low brightness

That's the same brightness I was using on my IPS. And if you watched the videos then you'd know that those people use OLEDs at "almost max brightness" and see no burn in.

> dynamic dimming

Such features are unnoticeable during normal use and most of them are defaults.

> the fact that there’s anything, even if you have to “look for it”

Again, this is only noticeable if your room is completely black and you're staring at gray content.

To counter your argument, you have a much worse backlight bleeding on IPS, which is very but very visible during normal use. To quote you: "the fact that there's anything, is not a good sign".

It's weird how you call OLEDs bad but completely forget about IPS downsides, and I'm not gonna even start on VA.

At the current state, OLED wins.

I _have_ watched those videos and they show burn-in after an alarmingly short amount of use. My current IPS monitor has been going strong for the past decade. I expect monitors to last at least that long. Get back to us about your burn-in after 8.6 more years.

Adding one more reference, here is a recent post to /r/monitors showing burn-in after 2 years of constant use: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/1pf0tmi/here_is_m...

And as a personal anecdote, I've experienced burn-in on my pixel 3a after 2 years. When switching to a full-screen solid grey, you could clearly see the bottom button bar with the home/back buttons.

  • > I _have_ watched those videos and they show burn-in after an alarmingly short amount of use.

    Debatable, it's not what those content creators say, and I definitely wouldn't call it alarming if it requires you to stare at gray background in a dark room. It isn't even half as bad as IPS backlight bleeding or VA angles. Different people have different standards. You don't have to buy it if you don't like it.

    > Adding one more reference, here is a recent post to /r/monitors showing burn-in after 2 years of constant use

    Pixel clean cannot run if the monitor is constantly receiving signal.

    Also show me an IPS after 2 years of constant use. The backlight can degrade as well.

    [edit] Furthermore, 3 year warranty covers your burn in, so I guess they would happily replace your monitor once the burn in normally visible. [/edit]

    > Get back to us about your burn-in after 8.6 more years.

    Feel free to ping my email (@gmail.com) at that time.

    > I've experienced burn-in on my pixel 3a after 2 years

    2019. My Nothing Phone 2 is from 2023. I've been having it for 1y 8mo+ and experienced zero burn in on the same gray test. For reference, I don't use automatic brightness and it's almost full-brightness all-day (except evenings).

    • > it's not what those content creators say

      Quoting one of your videos: "After 21 months, seeing these artifacts is certainly annoying". If I spend $3k on a monitor, it should _not_ be annoying after 2 years.

      Also "If your primary monitor use case is productivity, you likely have up to 3 years of decent usage under normal conditions before burn-in starts to become a concern". I almost exclusively use my monitor for productivity, and it definitely needs to last more than 3 years.

      > Pixel clean cannot run if the monitor is constantly receiving signal.

      True, but pixel clean works by burning-in the rest of your (sub)pixels so that they are evenly burned. Therefore what you are seeing in that photo is permanent degradation of those (sub)pixels. The clean will smooth it out so it doesn't look bad, but those pixels will never be as bright again. That portion of their life is spent. It is an unavoidable part of how OLED works.

      I agree that emissive displays are the future. But OLED is not the way to get there.

      1 reply →

  • Also my gf used to use Samsung A40 which is also from 2019 and there's no burn in. The only issue I see is slow response times, however she upgraded in 2022 and again a few months ago.