← Back to context Comment by LeoPanthera 4 hours ago If you don't read the article, "father" implies his son was a child, but his son was 36. 3 comments LeoPanthera Reply rootusrootus 4 hours ago Huh, even when my kids are grown ass adults I will consider them my children, and myself their father. Imustaskforhelp 2 hours ago > "father" implies his son was a childFather doesn't imply that. What sort of implication is that?Father implies that, the person who had the delusional spiral was his son, that son could be adult. The title is absolutely correct. theshackleford 4 hours ago > If you don't read the article, "father" implies his son was a child, but his son was 36.Biologically and relationally, he in fact remains his fathers child.I also took no such implication from the title? It might be your interpretation, it was not mine.
rootusrootus 4 hours ago Huh, even when my kids are grown ass adults I will consider them my children, and myself their father.
Imustaskforhelp 2 hours ago > "father" implies his son was a childFather doesn't imply that. What sort of implication is that?Father implies that, the person who had the delusional spiral was his son, that son could be adult. The title is absolutely correct.
theshackleford 4 hours ago > If you don't read the article, "father" implies his son was a child, but his son was 36.Biologically and relationally, he in fact remains his fathers child.I also took no such implication from the title? It might be your interpretation, it was not mine.
Huh, even when my kids are grown ass adults I will consider them my children, and myself their father.
> "father" implies his son was a child
Father doesn't imply that. What sort of implication is that?
Father implies that, the person who had the delusional spiral was his son, that son could be adult. The title is absolutely correct.
> If you don't read the article, "father" implies his son was a child, but his son was 36.
Biologically and relationally, he in fact remains his fathers child.
I also took no such implication from the title? It might be your interpretation, it was not mine.