← Back to context

Comment by don_esteban

8 hours ago

Yes, my stance is cynical.

Sadly, it is also factually correct (i.e. not delusional).

Which of my statements are you contesting?

From my point of view, your stance (play fairly, according to the rules set by your stronger opponent) is delusional. Note that the opponent is not 'republicans', but the whole ruling elites.

And no, I can't help you, I am not USian, just an outside observer. Sadly, due to its weight, whatever USA does, heavily influences everybody else as well.

> it is also factually correct

No, it isn’t. Sanders’ supporters didn’t have the votes. That’s a fact.

If people believe in something, they should call their electeds and vote. The fact that a lot of people with a certain confluence of views (privacy, anti-war, et cetera) are too lazy to do either (regardless of post rationalization), but not self aware enough to not complain about it, is delusional cynicism.

  • Note that I did not say he won the primaries.

    I said the leadership of the democratic party did dirty tricks to prevent him winning.

    The mainstream media was also against him.

    Not anywhere close to a level playing field.

    Note, that I am not against voting or calling your elected officials and all the related stuff. That is necessary. But, sadly, far from sufficient. If you think that that is sufficient, you are delusional.

    Your subsequent generalizations are lazy and unsubstantiated, in fact they fit the classical smear patterns established by the mainstream media.