← Back to context Comment by orthoxerox 5 months ago So what? Is reading code the same as copying code or modifying existing code? 3 comments orthoxerox Reply Orygin 5 months ago If you want to prove you did not make a derivative work, yes it helps if you never read the source code. Hence so call "clean room" implementations. orthoxerox 5 months ago Why should I prove that? Let those who claim the violation prove that. Orygin 5 months ago There is plenty of evidence already. The claim has been substantiated.You can't just dismiss it then say the claimant has to provide proof.
Orygin 5 months ago If you want to prove you did not make a derivative work, yes it helps if you never read the source code. Hence so call "clean room" implementations. orthoxerox 5 months ago Why should I prove that? Let those who claim the violation prove that. Orygin 5 months ago There is plenty of evidence already. The claim has been substantiated.You can't just dismiss it then say the claimant has to provide proof.
orthoxerox 5 months ago Why should I prove that? Let those who claim the violation prove that. Orygin 5 months ago There is plenty of evidence already. The claim has been substantiated.You can't just dismiss it then say the claimant has to provide proof.
Orygin 5 months ago There is plenty of evidence already. The claim has been substantiated.You can't just dismiss it then say the claimant has to provide proof.
If you want to prove you did not make a derivative work, yes it helps if you never read the source code. Hence so call "clean room" implementations.
Why should I prove that? Let those who claim the violation prove that.
There is plenty of evidence already. The claim has been substantiated.
You can't just dismiss it then say the claimant has to provide proof.